Not an Engouraging Term

I have noticed a sort of apologist phrase used for describing bad movies. Summer "blockbusters" tend to get saddled with this label more that other films. That term is "mindless popcorn flick." I think I understand the intent behind the phrase. The movie does not have aspirations for high art, the filmmakers just wanted to make shit explode for an hour and a half. The phrase does not fill me with confidence, however. In fact, any hopes I may have had for the movie tend to drain away rather quickly.

Telling me that in order to achieve the full experience something has to offer, I have to suspend cognitive function makes me wonder why I am encouraged to pay money for the experience at all. Now, there are plenty of movies I have enjoyed that could possibly be considered "mindless." These movies are usually quite forgettable, though. The only one that comes to mind is Starship Troopers, and that may be because of my attachment to the book, rather than anything from the movie, itself.

To be fair, I do not go into movies such as Iron Man or Pineapple Express expecting Oscar-caliber cinema. What I do expect is a reason to remember the movie past the drive home. People tell me I should go into these "popcorn flicks" with no expectations. If I had no expectations, I would not be sitting in the theater. If I had no expectations, my interest could likely be measured with the same gauge.

There are exceptions. Usually, if I can borrow a video or see it on cable, I will give something a chance. I have no problem watching Shoot 'em Up on HBO. I even enjoyed the movie while it was on. Once it was over, I had no intention of inclination to ever see it again.

If I wanted to turn my mind off and enjoy something, there are plenty of options open to me that are free, or included in things I already pay for.